#XPROTECT SMART CLIENT UPDATE UPDATE#
#XPROTECT SMART CLIENT UPDATE FULL#
#XPROTECT SMART CLIENT UPDATE PRO#
#XPROTECT SMART CLIENT UPDATE PC#

It is supposed to support GPU decoding though so I'm at least getting that benefit. I think if I added a few 4k streams and extra 4k monitors to my 530, it would possibly become a bottleneck, but I'm also using Geovision, which has some of the worst programming I've ever seen. When I monitor it with GPU-z for just 4 streams on my 4k tv it utilizes over 30% GPU load, and that's for 2 streams that are less than 1080p. I know that my Intel HD 530 can't handle much though. I don't know how many 4k displays and 4k streams you would need to bog a 1070 or 1080 down, it would be fun to test out, especially for a video wall. Sometimes it just doesn't have the performance though. Top of the chart.Д¬lick to expand.Indeed, on-board video is very low for power consumption. I was just checking out Passmark scores and the GTX1080 just popped in there in the last half hour. Support for dual streaming of GV-Fisheye CameraДЇunny. Support for GPU decoding with external NVIDIA graphics cards Support for GV-ASManager / GV-LPR Plugin V4.3.5.0 I've been considering upgrading the GPU but wanted to try 2016 Xprotect first for comparison. With this hardware I still get herky jerkies quite often, but I think it's because of bad Geo programming, but who knows, maybe I'm bottle-necked somewhere and don't know it. I usually get about 35% GPU load and 40% CPU load while viewing on 1 4K TV and 1 1280x1024 monitor for comparison. Using this machine as a recording and live view machine. I'm running an i7 6700k with 16GB of memory and Intel HD Graphics 530 and a GTX 650ti. I may give it a go just to see if my results are equally as dismal. I haven't tried Xprotect since 2014 but was hoping to try 2016 this weekend. It sounds like Xprotect is a CPU hog even more than Geo. I've been considering switching from Geo to Xprotect for some time now, but you guys are making me not want to switch. It must be in the works or something by now one would hope. Go figure.Дoes anyone know when Xprotect will finally support GPU decoding for Nvidia cards? I've been wondering why Geovision has been doing the same thing as Xprotect by not supporting GPU decoding/acceleration for Nvidia graphics cards and then low and behold, Geo does it, and before Xprotect. It is Geovision after all though, so who really knows. That means if you have GV-VMS and happen to be able to pick up a brand new Nvidia GTX1070 or 1080 this launch weekend, your camera streams will be screaming fast.

#XPROTECT SMART CLIENT UPDATE UPDATE#

In the GV-VMS update for Feb, they added Nvidia graphics cards for GPU decoding. I never thought I'd see the day when Geovision would pull one over on Xprotect, but apparently they have.

#XPROTECT SMART CLIENT UPDATE PRO#

Would Iris Pro graphics make any difference? It is currently not available in end-user socket 1151 CPUs, so I would probably have to wait. AFAIK, XProtect does not support any other type of GPU acceleration apart from Intel's QuickSync, right? If so, what could/should I expect from my CPU? What would be necessary to increase frame rates?Дoes the CPU clock make any difference, or merely GPU clock? If only GPU clock matters, a i5-6600 would be much cheaper than a i7. The reseller where I purchased XProtect was not much help, he claimed a dedicated video card would help. I had to reduce resolution for FHD in order to get fluid frame rates at ~75% CPU.

#XPROTECT SMART CLIENT UPDATE FULL#

When trying to view all 5 cameras at once at full resolution, CPU load is maxed out and the video stutters, even though, according to the diagnostics overlay, hardware acceleration is on. I have two monitors connected to the onboard video.

#XPROTECT SMART CLIENT UPDATE PC#

I have a new setup with 5xHiKVision DS-2CD2642fwd (4MP) and a client PC with a Core i5-6400 and 8GB RAM. I wonder if someone here has more details about XProtect SmartClient 2016 and GPU acceleration.

Xprotect smart client update